Litigation

Subscribe to Litigation via RSS

Much has been written about the risks of lawyers relying on generative artificial intelligence (Gen. AI) to draft briefs—especially when unchecked citations turn out to be hallucinated. But lawyer briefs are not the only documents that demand scrutiny. As the cases below show, lawyers must also carefully review their experts’ affidavits, declarations, and reports before submitting them to other parties or the court.
Continue Reading Expert Testimony in the Age of Generative AI: Recent Case Developments

On June 10, 2025, the U.S. Courts’ Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure approved a set of proposed amendments to the Federal Rules, including introducing Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707, which addresses the admissibility of AI-generated evidence. Proposed Rule 707 would require that machine-generated evidence—when offered without a human expert—meet the same admissibility…

On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted 3-2 in favor of banning noncompete clauses. The FTC first proposed the Noncompete Clause Rule on Jan. 19, 2023, under sections 5 and 6(g) of the FTC Act. GT previously covered the FTC’s request for comments.

Continue reading the full GT Alert.

Given ChatGPT’s now-infamous capacity to generate its own legal opinions, complete with official-looking, but entirely confabulated, citations and quotations, it is not surprising that courts remain skeptical of its use in judicial proceedings. And as the lawyers in J.G. v. New York City Dep’t of Educ. recently discovered, practitioners should not be surprised by courts’…

Corporate and M&A litigation in Delaware has started 2023 at an incredible pace. The Delaware Court of Chancery in particular has addressed numerous important, novel, and practice-moving issues mentioned below with some practical takeaways informed by attorneys from GT’s other offices and related practices.

Click here to access the full GT Update.